•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Sport for Development and Peace (SDP) has emerged as a global concept for advancing humanitarian, peacebuilding and social benefits, particularly in disadvantaged communities and conflict-affected regions of the world. Yet, its promise is often entangled with the broader contradictions of international aid, which in the Global South often shifts from solidarity to systems shaped by power asymmetries, geopolitics and self-interests. Drawing on critical aid theory and decolonial thought, foregrounded in the Palestine context, we argue that SDP offers potential benefits but remains constrained by the very systemic issues it purports to redress. Further, we critique the International Olympic Committee’s stance of neutrality, raising questions about its significance as the supposed custodian of SDP globally and its ethical responsibility in conflict-affected contexts. Ultimately, we call for a reimagined SDP paradigm, grounded in humanitarian service, local voices, political consciousness, resistance to structural injustice and social protection.

Share

COinS