Date of Award
8-2023
Document Type
Campus Access Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
History
First Advisor
Jonathan M. Chu
Second Advisor
Elizabeth McCahill
Third Advisor
Vincent J. Cannato
Abstract
North Carolina’s first ratifying convention at Hillsborough left the state outside of the Union. The state’s choice not to ratify the Constitution in 1788 has been widely overlooked given that North Carolina did ratify the Constitution a little over a year later. The thesis examines the motivating factors behind the decision not to ratify at Hillsborough, arguing the relationship between taxation and representation in the national legislature left many North Carolinians certain that the new federal system would end in despotism. The first chapter addresses the regional tensions that led to the development of two distinctive cultures between the eastern and western regions of North Carolina with a focus on the development of western culture. The second chapter addresses the role of the North Carolina delegation at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787. This chapter takes into consideration the backgrounds of the delegates as well as their actions at the convention to understand the eastern perspective on ratification. The final chapter focuses on the Hillsborough ratifying convention in 1788 and examines the arguments of both eastern and western delegates to understand the philosophical differences that emerged as a result of cultural differences. The thesis concludes that the western delegation, which easily outnumbered the eastern delegation, refused to ratify the Constitution at Hillsborough because of a history of government corruption and abuse at the expense of westerners, who believed the legislative structure proposed in the Constitution would result in despotism due to the relationship between taxation and representation.
Recommended Citation
Carlson, Maria A., "Culture Wars: North Carolina, Representation, and the Vote on the Federal Constitution of 1787" (2023). Graduate Masters Theses. 803.
https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses/803
Comments
Free and open access to this Campus Access Thesis is made available to the UMass Boston community by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. Those not on campus and those without a UMass Boston campus username and password may gain access to this thesis through resources like Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global or through Interlibrary Loan. If you have a UMass Boston campus username and password and would like to download this work from off-campus, click on the "Off-Campus UMass Boston Users" link above.