Author ORCID Identifier

0000-0001-6886-2596

Date of Award

5-31-2026

Document Type

Open Access Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Business Administration

First Advisor

Edward Carberry

Second Advisor

Maureen Scully

Third Advisor

Romilla Syed

Abstract

Employees in the tech sector have increasingly started questioning the nature of their work and the businesses of their firms to understand their role in the broader society. As such, many are mobilizing to speak up against issues that are important to them, the firms, and society. This dissertation examines when and how such employee activism is effective by focusing on major cases at tech companies such as Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Wayfair. I use social movement and activism literature derived from the social and political sciences, information systems, and communications fields to apply the insights generated from them to analyze how opportunity structures, tactics, frames, corporate responses, and online engagement shape the course and consequences of these campaigns across three distinct essays. Using a multi-method approach, I first conduct comparative case studies of the four firms to explain how employee activists leverage external and internal opportunity structures and how these choices affect their tactics, mobilization, and outcomes. I then analyze cycles of interaction between activists and corporate leaders at Google and Amazon over time, showing how firms respond to activists by using different strategic orientations and engagement approaches, ranging from concessions to intimidation, retaliation, and no response. Finally, I use qualitative and quantitative analysis of social media data from Google and Amazon to examine how different framing strategies generate online engagement and how that engagement relates to corporate response. Across the three essays, I conceptualize employee activism effectiveness as multidimensional, encompassing online and offline mobilization, corporate response, and broader social impact, and I argue that employee activism is best understood as an extended, interactive process that develops through what I call ‘cycles of interactions’ between activists and corporations.

Comments

Free and open access to this work is made available to the UMass Boston community by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. Those not on campus and those without a UMass Boston campus username and password may gain access to this work through Interlibrary Loan. If you have a UMass Boston campus username and password and would like to download this work from off-campus, click on the “Off-Campus Users” button.

Available for download on Thursday, June 01, 2028

Share

COinS