Policy Determination at the District Level: A Comparative Analysis of Community Schools in Boston and Baltimore City
Date of Award
Campus Access Dissertation
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Education/Leadership in Urban Schools
Many researchers, politicians, and educators argue that education reforms focused solely on efforts inside school walls are not broad enough to translate into significant gains in academic performance for students in low-income areas or to close the achievement gap. Only limited research, however, has focused on the formulation and determination of large-scale education reform policies such as community schools at the district level in large cities. My research uses a process tracing analysis of the respective policy determination processes in Baltimore City, MD and Boston, MAtwo cities that contemplated community schools as a reform possibility. The process tracing methodology explores and describes phenomena related to the policy processes in order to “add inferential leverage that is often lacking in quantitative analysis” (Collier, 2011 p. 823). Kingdon’s (1995) Multiple Streams model frames my analysis of the complicated and interconnected pathways that lie beneath the surface of each city’s policy decisions, as well as illuminates the roles of key individuals, policy dynamics, and organizations in the policy making process. The study revealed an array of inhibiting factors in Boston and a more complicated series of enabling and inhibiting policy dynamics in Baltimore City, suggesting three dynamics that, if in place, may facilitate policy determination processes around large-scale education reform initiatives: (1) sufficient collective political will from the superintendent and the mayor; (2) a clearly defined model with targeted messaging and effective marketing; and (3) powerful advocacy by community members and coalitions.
Woods, Emily J., "Policy Determination at the District Level: A Comparative Analysis of Community Schools in Boston and Baltimore City" (2019). Graduate Doctoral Dissertations. 806.
Free and open access to this Campus Access Dissertation is made available to the UMass Boston community by ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. Those not on campus and those without a UMass Boston campus username and password may gain access to this dissertation through resources like Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global or through Interlibrary Loan. If you have a UMass Boston campus username and password and would like to download this work from off-campus, click on the "Off-Campus UMass Boston Users" link above.