Kelsey Fagan

Date of Completion

5-31-2024

Document Type

Campus Access Capstone

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

First Advisor

Robert Ricketts

Second Advisor

Jeremy Szteiter

Abstract

This paper examines the role of metacognition in military leadership, drawing insights from the strategic thinking and decision-making processes of historical figures like George Washington and Nathanael Greene during the American Revolutionary War. Metacognition, the awareness and regulation of one's own thought processes, is identified as a crucial component of effective leadership, enabling commanders to navigate complex environments, make sound decisions, and inspire their teams.

The paper begins by defining metacognition and its key elements, including self-monitoring, self-evaluation, and self-regulation. It then delves into a historical analysis of Washington and Greene's metacognitive approaches, highlighting how their reflective decision-making, adaptability, and cognitive awareness shaped the course of the Revolutionary War. The author's personal experiences in transitioning from Cadet to Second Lieutenant in the United States Army further illustrates the practical significance of integrating metacognitive strategies into modern military leadership.

The paper argues that by emulating the metacognitive practices of historical leaders, contemporary military commanders can enhance their own decision-making capabilities, foster adaptability, and improve overall operational effectiveness. Specific strategies recommended include reflective decision-making, self-monitoring and regulation, goal setting and evaluation, and recognizing the potential in subordinates. The paper concludes by emphasizing the enduring relevance of metacognition in military leadership and its power to shape a future of unparalleled operational excellence.

Download
Off-Campus UMass Boston Users

Share

COinS